CBCA 8406

McKenzie Construction & Site Development, LLC

Apr 14, 2025Judge LesterGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
DismissalDismissed on other grounds

Key Facts

Appellant
McKenzie Construction & Site Development, LLC
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Lester
Case number
CBCA 8406
Decided
Apr 14, 2025The decision states Apr 14, 2025 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
Koprince McCall Pottroff LLC
Outcome
Dismissed on other grounds
This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Shane J. McCall and Nicole D. Pottroff and John L. Holtz and Gregory P. Weber and Stephanie L. Ellis and Annie E. Birney
Koprince McCall Pottroff LLC
Lawrence, KS
For the respondent
Alexander C. Vincent
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,190 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 14, 2025 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 14, 2025

CBCA 8406

McKENZIE CONSTRUCTION & SITE DEVELOPMENT, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Shane J. McCall, Nicole D. Pottroff, John L. Holtz, Gregory P. Weber, Stephanie L. Ellis, and Annie E. Birney of Koprince McCall Pottroff LLC, Lawrence, KS, counsel for Appellant.

Alexander C. Vincent, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

LESTER, Board Judge.

Order

On April 7, 2025, appellant, McKenzie Construction & Site Development, LLC (McKenzie), filed a notice of appeal with the Board, challenging a General Services Administration (GSA) contracting officer’s decision denying McKenzie’s claim for revision of its Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation under contract number 47PD0322D0012. Subsequently, on April 11, 2025, McKenzie filed a motion seeking to dismiss this appeal with prejudice, representing that the appeal is now moot because GSA has amended the CPARS evaluation and resolved the parties’ dispute. McKenzie’s motion is granted. This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Harold D. Lester, Jr.

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in McKenzie Construction & Site Development, LLC, CBCA 8406. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.