Search every Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals decision and read grounded, citation-verified AI legal analysis. Win rates by issue, semantic search, a citation knowledge graph, and a research agent over the full corpus, with every case one click from the official ruling.
Decisions
FROM ASBCA.MIL
Cases AI-Analyzed
GROUNDED LEGAL BRIEFS
Years Covered
DECISION DATE RANGE
Board Judges
IN THE ANALYZED CORPUS
Appellant Win Rate
SUSTAINED + PARTIAL
Government Win Rate
APPEALS DENIED
DCAA Involved
OF ANALYZED CASES
Issue Types Tracked
TAXONOMY-CLASSIFIED
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) is the forum that hears and decides contract disputes between government contractors and the Department of War, NASA, and other agencies under the Contract Disputes Act.
Its decisions are the case law of government contracting — cost allowability under FAR Part 31, CAS compliance, terminations, delay and disruption, the statute of limitations, DCAA audits, and more. For contractors, counsel, and compliance teams, they are the clearest signal of how the Board actually rules.
GovConDash brings together the full corpus from asbca.mil and layers grounded AI analysis on top, so you can search, compare, and understand decades of decisions in minutes, with every claim traceable to the source PDF.
Issues
Cost allowability, CAS, terminations, delay/disruption, REAs, statute of limitations, jurisdiction
Parties
Contractors vs. DoD components, NASA, and other agencies
Oversight
DCAA and DCMA involvement flagged from the record
Source
Official decision PDFs published at asbca.mil
Statistics and case facts are retrieved from the grounded corpus, never invented. AI analysis is labeled, citation-verified against the source text, and scored for grounding. Every decision links out to the official asbca.mil PDF so you can verify any point yourself.
A complete research workflow over the ASBCA corpus, grounded in the record and tuned for government contracting counsel, compliance, and business development.
Every analyzed case becomes a structured legal brief — synopsis, holding, issues presented, standard of review, disposition, and a quantum table — written in a neutral legal register for counsel and compliance teams.
Every cited authority, supporting quote, and dollar amount is string-matched back to the source PDF and assigned a grounding score. Citations cross-link to the FAR Library and eCFR. Nothing is asserted that is not in the record.
Search by concept, not just keywords — "DCAA cost disallowance on a CPFF contract" surfaces the right cases through pgvector embeddings fused with full-text search.
A GraphRAG knowledge graph links cases, authorities, judges, agencies, and issues — traverse the citation network and let the agent reason over connected decisions.
Win rates by issue type, the issue-by-outcome heatmap, judge tendencies, CAS standards litigated, and awarding-agency intelligence — the patterns across decades of decisions.
Ask questions in plain language across the entire corpus. The agent retrieves, reasons, and answers — citing only the cases it actually pulled, each one click from the official PDF.
Cases are cross-referenced to USAspending.gov by their contract number to resolve the pricing/vehicle type and awarding sub-agency and office — clearly labeled as external context.
The corpus comes directly from asbca.mil and every row links to the official ruling PDF. AI analysis is labeled and grounded in the source text, so you can verify any point in one click.
Live aggregates over 4,606 AI-analyzed cases. Where appellants win, how appeals are disposed, and where litigation concentrates.
Win rate = (sustained + partially sustained) ÷ decided cases for that issue. Issues with fewer than 10 decided cases are omitted. Verify against source PDFs.
Not shown: Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Liquidated Damages, Indirect Rates / Incurred Cost, Inspection / Acceptance / Warranty / Latent Defects, Statutory Compliance, Government-Furnished Property, CPARS / Past-Performance Evaluation, Mistake / Reformation, Defective Pricing / TINA, Acceleration, Reprocurement / Excess Costs, Novation / Assignment (234 tags, each too small a share to draw).
The full dashboard adds judge tendencies, the issue-by-outcome heatmap, CAS standards litigated, awarding-agency intelligence, top-cited authorities, semantic and hybrid search, a knowledge graph, and an AI research agent over the entire corpus.
Unlock the full insights dashboardA narrative client-alert on a single decision, grounded end to end in the analyzed record. It leads with the governing principle, pairs each party's argument with the Board's holding, situates the case among similar decisions, and closes with practical takeaways for contractors.
“Filing briefs without taking the necessary care in their preparation, including reliance on fictitious opinions or incorrect citations, whether AI-generated or not, risks sanctions.”
The full AI analysis for ASBCA 63286 · Honeywell International, Inc. — a professional analysis of the ASBCA decision with verified-in-source citations and an embedded knowledge graph. This is exactly what you get inside GovConDash for every analyzed decision.
View the full decision pageSearch 4,668 decisions by appellant, ASBCA number, or judge, and filter by year. Each row links to the official ruling PDF on asbca.mil.
| Decision Date | ASBCA Number | Appellant / Petitioner | Judge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2, 2026 | 63517-ADR63850-ADR | Bodell Construction Company Cates-Harman | Cates-Harman | |
| October 2, 2026 | 63580-ADR | Procal Electric, Inc. Sweet | Sweet | |
| October 1, 2026 | 64120 | Africa Transport Logistics Company McLish | McLish | |
| October 1, 2026 | 64328 | Kearfott Corporation Wilson | Wilson | |
| October 1, 2026 | 64606 | Relyant Global, LLC Wilson | Wilson | |
| October 1, 2026 | 64651 | Relyant Global, LLC Wilson | Wilson | |
| September 30, 2026 | 6259162783 | Huffman Construction, LLC Hamady | Hamady | |
| September 30, 2026 | 6319663431 | Martin Brothers Construction Eyester | Eyester | |
| September 30, 2026 | 6353963540 | Korte Construction Company O'Connell | O'Connell | |
| September 29, 2026 | 64484 | GiaMed Alliance JV, LLC Wilson | Wilson | |
| September 24, 2026 | 63405 | Vigor Marine, LLC Eyester | Eyester | |
| September 24, 2026 | 64321 | US Military Corp Arnett | Arnett | |
| September 23, 2026 | 63676 | WEB LLC/WEBCO McIlmail | McIlmail | |
| September 23, 2026 | 64167 | Environet, Inc. McLish | McLish | |
| September 23, 2026 | 6423564236 | Relyant Global LLC McIlmail | McIlmail | |
| September 22, 2026 | 61612 | Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling Support McIlmail | McIlmail | |
| September 22, 2026 | 64085 | Arctic Swan Construction Inc. Woodrow | Woodrow | |
| September 22, 2026 | 64648 | DCS Corporation Wilson | Wilson | |
| September 15, 2026 | 645966459764598 | Wild Hare Haulers, LLC Wilson | Wilson | |
| September 14, 2026 | 64327 | Hensel Phelps Construction Company McLish | McLish | |
| September 10, 2026 | 64588 | ERM Safety, Inc. Hamady | Hamady | |
| September 10, 2026 | 6459964600 | Industrial Marine Inc. Wilson | Wilson | |
| September 9, 2026 | 640386433664428 | Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint Venture D'Alessandris | D'Alessandris | |
| September 9, 2026 | 64054 | Hexagon U.S. Federal, Inc. Hamady | Hamady | |
| September 9, 2026 | 641386413964140641416414264143641446414564146641476414864149641506415164152641536415464155641566415764158641596421064211642126421364214642156421664217642186421964220643666436764368644406444164473 | HomeSafe Alliance, LLC Wilson | Wilson |
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals publishes its decisions at asbca.mil. Every case here links to the official PDF.
41 U.S.C. §§ 7101–7109 — the statute governing contract claims and appeals to the boards of contract appeals.
Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 33 governs the disputes process, claims, and appeals procedures.
Cost allowability under FAR Part 31 is at the heart of many ASBCA cost-disallowance appeals.
48 CFR Chapter 99 — the CAS standards frequently litigated in board decisions involving cost accounting.
Defense Contract Audit Agency guidance and audit programs referenced throughout the corpus.