CBCA 9031

Tier 1 Management LLC

Sep 18, 2026Judge LesterDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Tier 1 Management LLC
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Judge
Lester
Case number
CBCA 9031
Decided
Sep 18, 2026The decision states Sep 18, 2026 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
In accordance with the parties' stipulation and request for entry of final judgment, Tier 1's appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interestTermination for convenienceSmall claims and accelerated procedure

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Owen Igori
Tier 1 Management LLC
Union, NJ
For the respondent
Stuart Radde
Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior
Bloomington, MN
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 3,349 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 18, 2026 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

3 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Agency FAR supplements1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: September 18, 2026

CBCA 9031

TIER 1 MANAGEMENT LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Owen Igori, Managing Member of Tier 1 Management LLC, Union, NJ, appearing for Appellant.

Stuart Radde, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Bloomington, MN, counsel for Respondent.

LESTER, Board Judge.

Appellant, Tier 1 Management LLC (Tier 1), filed a notice of appeal on August 21, 2026, seeking $2974 in bonding costs that it alleges it was unable to recoup as a result of the Department of the Interior’s early termination of its contract for convenience. Tier 1 included the bonding costs in a termination settlement proposal submitted to the agency’s contracting officer, but the costs were denied in a final decision dated May 27, 2026. Although, in its termination settlement proposal, Tier 1 sought the payment of several categories of costs in addition to bonding, all of which the contracting officer addressed and denied in the final decision, Tier 1 limited its appeal to the Board to its request for $2974 in bonding costs. In its notice of appeal, Tier 1 elected to have this appeal decided under the small claims procedure identified in Rule 52 of the Board’s Rules (48 CFR 6101.52 (published in eCFR)), which provides for the expedited resolution of the appeal by a single judge.

Soon after Tier 1 filed its notice of appeal, the parties engaged in settlement negotiations and, on September 10, 2026, executed a settlement agreement through which the agency agreed to pay $2974, inclusive of any interest under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2024), as “a full and final settlement of all Claims.” The agreement establishes a procedure by which, within forty-five days of execution of the settlement agreement, Tier 1 will submit an invoice to the agency seeking payment of $2974, after which the agency will release funds to Tier 1 “as soon as is practical after the receipt of Tier 1’s invoice or no later than January 31, 2027, provided that the above referenced invoice has been received by the [agency].” The agreement contains a mutual release of claims and rights between the parties.

Although the parties’ resolution of this appeal is governed by the settlement agreement that they executed on September 10, 2026, the parties filed a joint motion on September 11, 2026, asking the Board to enter a final judgment in the amount of $2974 in favor of Tier 1. They stipulate in their joint motion that, “upon entry of judgment, all disputes, claims, counterclaims and issues related to CBCA No. 9031 will be fully and finally resolved,” and they certify that, pursuant to Board Rule 25(b)(2), they “shall not seek reconsideration of, seek relief from, or appeal the judgment so rendered.” Because Tier 1 previously elected to have this appeal resolved using the small claims procedure, the judgment is being issued by the single judge presiding over the appeal, is final and conclusive, and may not be set aside except for fraud. See Board Rule 52(c).

Decision

In accordance with the parties’ stipulation and request for entry of final judgment, Tier 1’s appeal is GRANTED IN PART. Tier 1 is entitled to payment of $2974, inclusive of interest under the CDA, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney fees. Harold D. Lester, Jr.

HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Tier 1 Management LLC, CBCA 9031. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.