BAE Systems Land & Armaments Inc.
BAE Systems Land & Armaments Inc. appealed a decision regarding a defective pricing demand under Contract No. W56HZV-07-C-0660. The Board granted the appellant's motion to compel the government to file a complaint.
Material Facts
- The contract was a firm-fixed-price contract to produce parts for a military vehicle.
- BAE Systems subcontracted with Ibis Tek, LLC, for a portion of the work.
- The contract required submission of subcontractor cost or pricing data and contained clauses for price reductions if the data were defective.
- The DCAA audited the appellant's cost or pricing data and concluded that the subcontractor's cost or pricing data were defective.
- On 14 May 2013, the contracting officer issued a 'Defective Pricing Demand Letter' seeking debt recoupment for the alleged defective pricing.
- On 30 July 2013, BAE Systems submitted a certified claim challenging the government's price adjustment and demand for alleged defective pricing.
- On 24 March 2014, the contracting officer issued a final decision denying the claim.
Parties
- Appellant
- BAE Systems Land & Armaments Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W56HZV-07-C-0660
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 58030, 58593, 58594, 58660, 59212, 59220, 59813, 60376, 60403, 60411, 60522, 60736August 20, 2018
- Telford Aviation, Inc.No. 60040, 60876July 11, 2018
- Environmental Chemical CorporationNo. 60577June 15, 2018
- ECCI-C METAG, JVNo. 59667June 1, 2018
- KiewitPhelpsNo. 60850May 23, 2018
- New South Construction Company, Inc.No. 61314May 23, 2018
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Left Hand Design CorporationNo. 62458November 7, 2024
- Supreme Foodservice GmbHNo. 60309April 12, 2024
- AAI Corporation, d/b/a Textron Systems, Unmanned SystemsNo. 61195, 61356March 23, 2022
- BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P.No. 62703, 62704September 23, 2021
- Advanced Technologies Group, Inc.No. 59986, 61092November 18, 2020
- Alloy Surfaces Company, Inc.No. 59625April 9, 2020