Sungwoo E&C., Ltd.
Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd. appealed against the government's motions to strike and partially dismiss claims related to task orders under a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC). The Board found it had jurisdiction to consider the appeals despite the government's arguments regarding funding sources.
Material Facts
- The appeals arise from several task orders awarded to appellant for work performed in the Republic of Korea.
- The initial task orders were issued pursuant to a general construction, multiple award, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) task order contract.
- Appellant was awarded eleven task orders under the MATOC, with only three at issue in the appeals.
- The MATOC included provisions for payments to be made by the Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense (ROK MND) or by the United States with appropriated funds.
- Appellant's performance on three of the MATOC task orders was rated as unsatisfactory in the government's Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).
- Appellant disputes the government's evaluation of its performance and alleges fraudulent acts by the government.
Parties
- Appellant
- Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contracting Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W91QVN-14-D-0034
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Government and Military Certification Systems, Inc.No. 64434, 64470August 11, 2026
- Accu-Aire Mechanical, LLCNo. 64204April 29, 2026
- Kallidus TechnologiesNo. 61377, 61976December 18, 2025
- CLC Construction CompanyNo. 59110October 22, 2025
- Enfield Enterprises, Inc.No. 63631April 26, 2024
- Straub Driver, a Joint VentureNo. 61014April 3, 2024
Same Year
- Club Car, Inc.No. 61710December 30, 2019
- Universal Service Provider, LLCNo. 62021December 23, 2019
- Technica CorporationNo. 62160December 20, 2019
- AXXON International, LLCNo. 61224, 61268, 61625December 20, 2019
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Ford Lumber & Building Supply, Inc.No. 61618December 18, 2019
Same Issue
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
- Korte Construction CompanyNo. 63539, 63540September 30, 2026
- GiaMed Alliance JV, LLCNo. 64484September 29, 2026