DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 30, 2008
CBCA 1019
PACIFICARE ASIA PACIFIC,
Appellant,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
Respondent.
David W. Klaudt of Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, Dallas, TX, counsel for
Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Debra Petcove, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
Order
This appeal arose out of a dispute concerning final decision 182 of the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) dated October 2, 2007. PacificCare Asia Pacific disputes the OPM Inspector General’s finding in final audit report 1C-JK-00-04-031, specifically that PacificCare Asia Pacific used inappropriate overage dependent children’s loading charges to the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program in 1999, 2000, and 2001, in the amount of $473,469.
2 CBCA 1169
On July 17, 2008, appellant’s counsel contacted the Board informing it that PacificCare Asia Pacific and OPM had reached a settlement with regard to the above-captioned matter, and jointly requested that CBCA 1019 be dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Pacificare Asia Pacific, CBCA 1019. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.