DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 9, 2009
CBCA 1064
ABSi CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Paul M. Vincent, E. John Steren, and Chelsea S. Rice of Ober Kaler Grimes & Shriver, P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Ronald D. Sullivan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Austin, TX; and Phillipa L. Anderson and Phil Kauffman, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
Order
On February 1, 2008, the Board received from ABSi Corporation (contractor) a notice of appeal. The Department of Veterans Affairs awarded and administered the underlying contract, DO 2142, order 549E40011, for operations and maintenance services of the Department of Defense’s Executive Information Decision Support (EIDS) enterprise data system and architecture. The contractor sought payment of $2,830,800 for services rendered in the third option period of the contract. The contracting officer denied the claim. On February 6, 2009, the Board received a settlement agreement from the parties. The parties request a dismissal with prejudice.
______________________________
2 CBCA 1064
The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in ABSI CORPORATION, CBCA 1064. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.