CBCA 1126-C(105)

Hedlund Construction, Inc.

Sep 26, 2008Judge McCannDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Hedlund Construction, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
McCann
Case number
CBCA 1126-C(105)
Decided
Sep 26, 2008The decision states Sep 26, 2008 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Cushman Law Offices, P.S.
Outcome
Settled
In the stipulation the parties request dismissal of the case. __________________________________ 2 CBCA 1126-C(105) Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

EAJA and fees

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Jon E. Cushman
Cushman Law Offices, P.S.
Olympia, WA
For the respondent
Mary E. Sajna
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
Portland, OR
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,169 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 26, 2008 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Equal Access to Justice Act2

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 26, 2008

CBCA 1126-C(105)

HEDLUND CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Applicant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Jon E. Cushman of Cushman Law Offices, P.S., Olympia, WA, counsel for Applicant. Mary E. Sajna, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.

McCANN, Board Judge.

Order

On February 19, 2008, the Board issued its decision on the merits in Hedlund Construction, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture, CBCA 105, 08-1 BCA ¶ 33,798. Subsequently, on March 20, 2008, Hedlund submitted a claim for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504 (2000), in the amount of $51,869.44. That claim was suspended because it was filed before the time for appeal had expired. The parties subsequently entered into discussions and have now filed a stipulated order of dismissal, notifying the Board that they have settled Hedlund’s claim for attorney fees and expenses. In the stipulation the parties request dismissal of the case.

__________________________________

2 CBCA 1126-C(105)

Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

R. ANTHONY McCANN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Hedlund Construction, Inc., CBCA 1126-C(105). Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.