DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 23, 2009
CBCA 1268
SERCO, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
E. Sanderson Hoe, Stephen M. Sorett, William T. O’Brien, and Erin B. Sheppard of
McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Elin M. Dugan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
Order
On July 11, 2008, Serco, Inc., timely filed a notice of appeal of a contracting officer’s decision. Details of some of the issues are discussed in the Board’s denial of a Government motion for partial summary relief. Serco, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture, CBCA 1268, 09-2 BCA ¶ 34,269. The parties have resolved this dispute. Having received the last of the payments pursuant to a settlement agreement, the contractor seeks a dismissal with prejudice. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Serco, Inc., CBCA 1268. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.