CBCA 1286

American Contractor and Technology, Inc.

Mar 3, 2010Judge KullbergDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
American Contractor and Technology, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Judge
Kullberg
Case number
CBCA 1286
Decided
Mar 3, 2010The decision states Mar 3, 2010 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
The parties subsequently advised the Board on that same day that they had settled the underlying dispute in this appeal, and they jointly moved that the Board dismiss this appeal with prejudice. ______________________ 2 Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Jason Chanslor
American Contractor and Technology, Inc.
Scott, LA
For the respondent
Mark Langstein and Lauren Kalish
Office of General Counsel, Department of Commerce
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,097 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Mar 3, 2010 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 3, 2010

CBCA 1286

AMERICAN CONTRACTOR AND TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Jason Chanslor, President of American Contractor and Technology, Inc., Scott, LA, appearing for Appellant.

Mark Langstein and Lauren Kalish, Office of General Counsel, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

KULLBERG, Board Judge.

Order

On July 25, 2008, the Board docketed the appeal of American Contractor and Technology, Inc. On September 15, 2009, the Board scheduled the appeal for a hearing to commence on March 10, 2010. The Board convened a telephone conference with the parties on March 2, 2010. During the conference, the parties advised that they intended to discuss this appeal with each other after the conference. The parties subsequently advised the Board on that same day that they had settled the underlying dispute in this appeal, and they jointly moved that the Board dismiss this appeal with prejudice.

______________________

2 CBCA 1286

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

H. CHUCK KULLBERG

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in American Contractor and Technology, Inc., CBCA 1286. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.