DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 9, 2009
CBCA 1474
NATIVE ENERGY & TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
John C. Dulske, Joan Kelley Fowler Gluys, and Bryan L. Kost of The Law Offices of Dulske & Gluys, P.C., San Antonio, TX, counsel for Appellant.
Jim Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
Order
The parties have advised that the appeal has been settled through alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Pursuant to the terms of their final settlement agreement, the parties have submitted a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice. Accordingly, the appeal hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Native Energy & Technology, Inc., CBCA 1474. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.