CBCA 1541

Xerox Capital Services, LLC

Oct 1, 2010Judge VergilioDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Xerox Capital Services, LLC
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Vergilio
Case number
CBCA 1541
Decided
Oct 1, 2010The decision states Oct 1, 2010 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC
Outcome
Settled
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Richard D. Lieberman and Gabriel D. Soll
McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Ronald D. Sullivan
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Austin, TX
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 1,021 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Oct 1, 2010 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 1, 2010

CBCA 1541

XEROX CAPITAL SERVICES, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

Richard D. Lieberman and Gabriel D. Soll of McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC,

Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Ronald D. Sullivan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Austin, TX, counsel for Respondent.

VERGILIO, Board Judge.

Order

On March 24, 2009, the Board received from Xerox Capital Services, LLC (contractor) a notice of appeal, docketed as CBCA 1541, concerning a deemed denial of a claim relating to an unpaid contractor invoice arising under delivery orders issued by the respondent, the Department of Veterans Affairs, pursuant to the contractor’s contract, GS 25F 0062L, with the General Services Administration. On September 30, 2010, the Board received a request for a dismissal with prejudice; the parties have settled this dispute. The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Xerox Capital Services, LLC, CBCA 1541. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.