DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 27, 2009
CBCA 1584
CLARO COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Seth A. Robbins and Angeline R. Nelson of Quagliano & Seeger, P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Heather M. Self, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
McCANN, Board Judge.
Order
On May 11, 2009, Claro Communications Group, Inc. filed a notice of appeal in connection with a dispute under contract number 50-3142-5-0001, to perform certain physical security updates at sites in Leetown, West Virginia; Dubois, Idaho; and Pullman, Washington. On October 22, 2009, respondent filed a motion to dismiss, along with an executed settlement agreement. Appellant has no objection to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
R. ANTHONY McCANN
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Claro Communications Group, Inc., CBCA 1584. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.