DISMISSED: June 26, 2009
CBCA 1601
eSCRUB SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Ralph D. Genuario, CEO of eScrub Systems Incorporated, Wilmington, DE, appearing for Appellant.
Megan Davia Mikhail, General Law Division, Department of Energy, Argonne, IL, counsel for Respondent.
GILMORE, Board Judge.
Order
On June 1, 2009, eScrub Systems Incorporated (eScrub) filed a motion for summary relief with the Board, citing the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2006), as jurisdiction. The submission was docketed as CBCA 1601. The Board, on June 4, 2009, ordered the parties to brief the issue of jurisdiction to hear the “motion” since eScrub did not submit or reference a contracting officer’s final decision, nor request relief under a type of contract the Board is authorized to hear under the CDA. The briefs were due by July 7, 2009. _______________________________
2 CBCA 1601
On June 9, 2009, eScrub advised the Board that it had received new information from the contracting officer and wished the Board to dismiss the matter. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.
BERYL S. GILMORE
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Escrub Systems Incorporated, CBCA 1601. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.