CBCA 1676

Erickson Air-Crane, Inc.

Sep 27, 2010Judge GilmoreDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Not published in the listingRuled on a motion

Key Facts

Appellant
Erickson Air-Crane, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
Gilmore
Case number
CBCA 1676
Decided
Sep 27, 2010The decision states Sep 27, 2010 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Saltman & Stevens, P.C.
Outcome
Ruled on a motion
NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF OPINION UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from that line, because the decision's text states no operative ruling we could isolate. No model is involved.

Topics

Procedure and sanctions

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Alan I. Saltman
Saltman & Stevens, P.C.
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Elin M. Dugan
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 1,000 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 27, 2010 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF OPINION

UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER: September 27, 2010

CBCA 1676

ERICKSON AIR-CRANE, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Alan I. Saltman of Saltman & Stevens, P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. Elin M. Dugan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

GILMORE, Board Judge.

NOTICE

On September 27, 2010, the Board denied appellant’s motion for summary relief and respondent’s motion for partial summary relief. Because the Board’s decision contains information considered by the parties to be procurement sensitive or proprietary, the Board initially issued its decision subject in its entirety to a protective order. The parties were advised to inform the Board of any redactions they consider appropriate by close of business Thursday, October 7, 2010. The Board will decide at that time what portions of the decision will be made public.

BERYL S. GILMORE

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Erickson Air-Crane, Inc., CBCA 1676. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Topic

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.