DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 6, 2009
CBCA 1686
FAIRMOUNT OFFICE L.L.C.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Robert P. Rutila of Buchalter Nemer, Scottsdale, AZ, counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Donald C. Mobly, Phoenix Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Albuquerque, NM, counsel for Respondent.
POLLACK, Board Judge.
Order
On July 31, 2009, Fairmount Office L.L.C. (Fairmount) timely appealed a final decision from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denying Fairmount’s request for additional compensation attributed to added build-out, installation, and inspection costs. On September 15, 2009, the Board received a stipulation of settlement, executed by the parties, ___________________________________
2 CBCA 1686
under which the VA agreed to pay Fairmount the sum set out in the stipulation and Fairmount agreed to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
HOWARD A. POLLACK
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Fairmount Office L.L.C., CBCA 1686. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.