DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 24, 2009
CBCA 1688
XEROX CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Marnie G. Ganotis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
Order
On August 10, 2009, Xerox Corporation appealed the deemed denial of its claim under contract number GS-25F-0062L for payment for duplicating machines and supplies and services the company provided to the United States Department of Agriculture. On November 23, 2009, appellant filed a notice of dismissal stating that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement and requesting that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice. Respondent has no objection.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Xerox Corporation, CBCA 1688. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.