DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 1, 2010
CBCA 1692
D.E.F. CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,
Respondent.
George D. Ruttinger and Christopher E. Gagne, Crowell & `Moring LLP,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Susan Bartholomew, Office of General Counsel, Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
Order
The instant appeal has been resolved through alternative dispute resolution. The parties have advised the Board that appellant has received the entire settlement payment and that the parties have mutually released one another from all claims based on actions or events occurring prior to the settlement agreement. By joint motion, they seek to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in D.E.F. Corporation, CBCA 1692. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.