CBCA 1769

Eleven Eighteen Limited Partnership

Jan 29, 2010Judge KullbergDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Eleven Eighteen Limited Partnership
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Judge
Kullberg
Case number
CBCA 1769The Board's own document filename encodes 1622 instead. Both are the Board's, and the disagreement is recorded rather than resolved.
Decided
Jan 29, 2010The decision states Feb 19, 2010 on its own face, which is not the date the listing gives. Both are shown rather than one being quietly preferred.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Olson & Price, Ltd.
Outcome
Settled
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Delay, suspension and acceleration

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Thomas R. Olson
Olson & Price, Ltd.
West Saint Paul, MN
For the respondent
David Sett
Transportation
Lakewood, CO

Another listing row names this same document

The Board's listing points another decision at this same document, so the file may belong to that decision rather than this one. The Board's CDA case listing is the place to check.

Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 1,152 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Feb 19, 2010 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 19, 2010

CBCA 1622

DOUG O’BRYAN CONTRACTING, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Thomas R. Olson of Olson & Price, Ltd., West Saint Paul, MN, counsel for Appellant. David Sett, Division Counsel, Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.

VERGILIO, Board Judge.

Order

On June 25, 2009, the Board received from Doug O’Bryan Contracting, Inc.

(contractor) a notice of appeal seeking payment of $913,497.39 and a time extension of 209.5 days for unavoidable delays under its contract, DTFH68-07-C-00025, with the Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Highway Division, to construct a roadway. Formal proceedings were suspended, while the parties engaged in mediation. On February 19, 2010, the Board received from the contractor a request for a dismissal with prejudice; the parties have settled the case and executed a binding settlement agreement. The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Eleven Eighteen Limited Partnership, CBCA 1769. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.