CBCA 1962

Edlin Company Inc. And J&B Construction Services

Sep 8, 2011Judge SheridanAGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Edlin Company Inc. And J&B Construction Services
Respondent agency
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Judge
Sheridan
Case number
CBCA 1962The Board's own document filename encodes 2465 instead. Both are the Board's, and the disagreement is recorded rather than resolved.
Decided
Sep 8, 2011The decision states Sep 20, 2011 on its own face, which is not the date the listing gives. Both are shown rather than one being quietly preferred.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
National Center for State Courts
Outcome
Settled
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Timothy M. Hughes
National Center for State Courts
Arlington, VA
For the respondent
Natalie Thingelstad
Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International Development
Washington, DC

Another listing row names this same document

The Board's listing points another decision at this same document, so the file may belong to that decision rather than this one. The Board's CDA case listing is the place to check.

Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 624 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 20, 2011 on its own faceRespondent AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 20, 2011

CBCA 2465

NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS,

Appellant,

v.

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Timothy M. Hughes, National Center for State Courts, Arlington, VA, counsel for Appellant.

Natalie Thingelstad, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

SHERIDAN, Board Judge.

Order

On September 15, 2011, the parties indicated that the above-captioned matter had been settled and filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Edlin Company Inc. And J&B Construction Services, CBCA 1962. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.