CBCA 2

Roesler Industrial Distributing Company

May 20, 2008Judge PollackDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Not published in the listingGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Roesler Industrial Distributing Company
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
Pollack
Case number
CBCA 2
Decided
May 20, 2008The decision states May 20, 2008 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Saltman & Stevens, P.C.
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Ruth G. Tiger
Saltman & Stevens, P.C.
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Michael E. Trow
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
Portland, OR
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision3 pages, 3,096 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 20, 2008 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

3 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Other statutes1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: May 20, 2008

CBCA 2

ROESLER INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Ruth G. Tiger of Saltman & Stevens, P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant Michael E. Trow, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges POLLACK, STEEL, and DRUMMOND.

POLLACK, Board Judge.

This appeal arises out of timber sale contract no. 075902 between Roesler Industrial Distributing Company (Roesler) and the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (FS). Roesler filed its appeal on March 27, 1997, at the Department of Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals, claiming $1,037,167. The matter was docketed as AGBCA No. 97-139-1. Thereafter, the appeal was placed in suspense and ultimately reinstated on the board’s docket in January 2003 as AGBCA No. 2003-141-1. The matter was then transferred to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals and docketed as CBCA 2, upon consolidation of the civilian agency boards of contract appeals.

________________________________

2 CBCA 2

The parties thereafter engaged in discovery, as well as awaited decision on a case at the Court of Federal Claims (on further appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), involving another contractor, but similar issues. The parties anticipated that the decision in that case could serve to resolve a number of issues in the instant appeal. On June 1, 2007, the Board issued a ruling, denying cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties, and on November 29, 2007, the Board issued a proof of costs order. Thereafter, appellant filed its proof of cost submission, and the next step was for the FS to file its reply.

By letter of May 13, 2008, the parties notified the Board that they had reached a settlement. With the letter, the parties filed an executed Joint Stipulation and Request for Decision Granting the Appeal. The Joint Stipulation was also dated May 13, 2008. Under it, the parties agreed that they had settled any and all claims by either party arising out of or relating to contract no. 075902 and the instant appeal. Further, the parties agreed to abide by the Board decision requiring the FS to pay appellant, $235,000, plus interest, with interest being calculated pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act and running from January 1, 2003, until paid. Each party agreed to bear its own costs and attorney fees. The parties additionally stipulated that the decision of the Board would be final and binding upon the parties and not subject to further appeal.

Decision

Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ joint stipulation, the Board awards the sum of $235,000, plus interest on said amount under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 611(2000), beginning January 1, 2003. Payment is to be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.

HOWARD A. POLLACK

Board Judge

_____________________________ _____________________________

3 CBCA 2

We concur:

CANDIDA S. STEEL

Board Judge

JEROME M. DRUMMOND

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Roesler Industrial Distributing Company, CBCA 2. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.