CBCA 2232

Intelimap, Inc.

May 27, 2011Judge VergilioENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Intelimap, Inc.
Respondent agency
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Judge
Vergilio
Case number
CBCA 2232
Decided
May 27, 2011The decision states May 27, 2011 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
The Board grants the request; the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Miguel Echavarri
InteliMap, Inc.
Concord, MA
For the respondent
Jonathan S. Baker
Office of General Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 1,169 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 27, 2011 on its own faceRespondent ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 27, 2011

CBCA 2232

INTELIMAP, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Miguel Echavarri, President of InteliMap, Inc., Concord, MA, appearing for Appellant.

Jonathan S. Baker, Office of General Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

VERGILIO, Board Judge.

Order

On December 7, 2010, the Board received from InteliMap, Inc. (contractor) a notice of appeal concerning its claim for $1,724,799 in breach of contract damages arising under a purchase order, 2W-1394-WASA, placed by the Environment Protection Agency (agency). The contractor licensed a database to the agency. The contractor maintains that the agency failed to properly protect its database and failed to include safeguards to prevent a coordinated computer download of its confidential business information. On May 26, 2011, the parties filed a joint request seeking a dismissal with prejudice; they have resolved this dispute, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. The Board grants the request; the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Intelimap, Inc., CBCA 2232. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.