DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 12, 2011
CBCA 2303
BANNUM, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Joseph A. Camardo of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
William D. Robinson and Oleta L. Thomas, Office of General Counsel, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
Order
Respondent, by notice of corrective action and motion to dismiss, advised that the Government had decided to pay appellant the total amount of its cost claim, i.e., $1320. Since the Government had already withdrawn the deficiency citation that had been the subject of the instant appeal, the appeal has been rendered completely moot. Appellant had been afforded the opportunity to raise objection to respondent’s motion and to provide any valid legal basis for proceeding with the appeal. It failed to do so. Accordingly, the appeal hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Bannum, Inc., CBCA 2303. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.