CBCA 2376

Robert G. Gerhart

May 19, 2010Judge VergilioGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Robert G. Gerhart
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Vergilio
Case number
CBCA 2376
Decided
May 19, 2010The decision states May 19, 2010 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Termination for default

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant (pro se)
Robert G. Gerhart
New Waverly, TX
For the respondent
Gabriel N. Steinberg
Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration
Atlanta, GA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 1,065 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 19, 2010 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Contract Disputes Act1
Public laws1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 19, 2010

CBCA 2376

ROBERT G. GERHART,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

Robert G. Gerhart, pro se, New Waverly, TX.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Gabriel N. Steinberg, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.

VERGILIO, Board Judge.

Order

On April 6, 2011, the Board received from Robert G. Gerhart (purchaser) a timely-filed notice of appeal. 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (as codified by Pub. L. No. 111-350, 124 Stat. 3677, 3825). The purchaser successfully competed in an auction held by the respondent, the General Services Administration, obtaining trailers. The purchaser did not pay for the items. The contracting officer issued a notice of termination for default, and assessed liquidated damages. The purchaser seeks to be relieved of the debt. The parties have resolved this dispute. By submission received on May 19, 2011, the parties ask that the matter be dismissed with prejudice.

The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Robert G. Gerhart, CBCA 2376. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.