CBCA 2652-R, 2845-R

Summit Commerce Pointe, LLC

Apr 21, 2014Judge SternGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingDismissed on other grounds

Key Facts

Appellant
Summit Commerce Pointe, LLC
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Stern
Case number
CBCA 2652-R, 2845-RThis cell names 2 dockets: 2652-R, 2845-R.
Decided
Apr 21, 2014The decision states Apr 21, 2014 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Clark Hill PLC
Outcome
Dismissed on other grounds
The motion for reconsideration is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Procedure and sanctionsJurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Brett S. Wacker and Richard Sandquist and Andrew M. Mast
Clark Hill PLC
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Leslie M. Busch
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,601 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 21, 2014 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED AS MOOT: April 21, 2014

CBCA 2652-R, 2845-R

SUMMIT COMMERCE POINTE, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Brett S. Wacker, Richard Sandquist, and Andrew M. Mast of Clark Hill PLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Leslie M. Busch, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges STERN, HYATT, and SHERIDAN.

STERN, Board Judge.

On August 22, 2013, Summit Commerce Pointe, LLC (appellant) filed a motion for reconsideration of the Board’s order of July 23, 2013, dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Prior to the Board deciding the motion, appellant filed a petition for review of the order with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Court of Appeals). On November 25, 2013, the Board issued an order stating that as a result of appellant’s petition the Board would not render a decision on the motion for reconsideration unless requested or directed to do so by the Court of Appeals.

On March 10, 2014, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order issued by the Court. A dismissal for failure to prosecute operates as an adjudication on the merits, unless stated otherwise. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Board’s order of July 23, 2013, is final.

Decision

The motion for reconsideration is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

JAMES L. STERN

Board Judge

We concur:

CATHERINE B. HYATT

Board Judge

PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Summit Commerce Pointe, LLC, CBCA 2652-R, 2845-R. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.