DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:
February 6, 2017
CBCA 2952
OPTIMUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Christopher R. Shiplett, Nishat Azam, and Danielle N. Hart, of Randolph Law, PLLC, Falls Church, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Austin Fulk, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
Order
Optimus Technology, Inc. filed this appeal disputing the denial of its certified claim regarding its contract, OPM 040900009, with Office of Personnel Management. The parties settled the dispute prior to the date set for a hearing; the contractor has received payment pursuant to the agreement. In accordance with a joint request, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this matter.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Optimus Technology, Inc., CBCA 2952. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.