CBCA 344

Wrangler Enterprises, Inc.

Mar 20, 2007Judge KullbergDEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Not published in the listingDismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Key Facts

Appellant
Wrangler Enterprises, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Judge
Kullberg
Case number
CBCA 344
Decided
Mar 20, 2007The decision states Mar 20, 2007 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott
Outcome
Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Phillip J. Binotto, Jr. and Marcia L. DePaula
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott
Canonsburg, PA
For the respondent
Brenda D. Joseph-Chambers
Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,847 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Mar 20, 2007 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 20, 2007

CBCA 344

WRANGLER ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Phillip J. Binotto, Jr. and Marcia L. DePaula of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Canonsburg, PA, counsel for Appellant.

Brenda D. Joseph-Chambers, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

KULLBERG, Board Judge.

Order

Wrangler Enterprises, Inc. (WEI) filed this appeal with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Board of Contract Appeals against the Washington County (Pennsylvania) Housing Authority (WCHA). The Government moved to dismiss ______________________________

This appeal was docketed at that board of contract appeals as HUD BCA 06-K-101 C2. On January 6, 2007, the HUD board was terminated and its judges and cases were transferred to the newly-established Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. Pub. L. No. 109

2 CBCA 344

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2000), citing the fact that appellant’s claim arose out of a contract with the WCHA and not HUD. WEI argued, initially, that it had standing to bring this appeal under the CDA because HUD had funded the contract between WEI and the WCHA.

During a conference call on March 1, 2007, appellant represented that this appeal had been brought because of uncertainty as to the proper forum for bringing its claim against the WCHA and would be willing to stipulate that this Board has no jurisdiction in this appeal. On March 13, 2007, the parties jointly requested that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice.

This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

H. CHUCK KULLBERG

Board Judge

163, § 847, 119 Stat. 3136, 3391-95 (2006). The case was docketed by this Board as CBCA 344.

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Wrangler Enterprises, Inc., CBCA 344. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.