CBCA 411, 412

Key Federal Finance

Sep 6, 2007Judge Stern
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Key Federal Finance
Respondent agency
Read from the decision's own caption, and this one matches no measured caption shape or its text is not captured. The Board's listing names no agency at all.
Judge
Stern
Case number
CBCA 411, 412This cell names 2 dockets: 411, 412.
Decided
Sep 6, 2007The decision states Sep 6, 2007 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Petrillo & Powell, PLLC
Outcome
Settled
Respondents do not oppose the motion. ________________________________ 2 In accordance with the agreement of the parties, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Joseph J. Petrillo
Petrillo & Powell, PLLC
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Michael J. Noble
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 925 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 6, 2007 on its own face Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 6, 2007

KEY FEDERAL FINANCE,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent in CBCA 411,

and

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

Respondent in CBCA 412.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Joseph J. Petrillo of Petrillo & Powell, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent in CBCA 411.

Fred Kopatich, Office of General Counsel, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent in CBCA 412.

STERN, Board Judge.

Order

Appellant has advised the Board that the parties have settled all matters raised in these appeals, and accordingly, moves the Board to dismiss the appeals with prejudice. Respondents do not oppose the motion.

________________________________

2 CBCA 411, 412

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

JAMES L. STERN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Key Federal Finance, CBCA 411, 412. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.