DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 16, 2007
CBCA 533
PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES MANAGEMENT, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
John W. Polk of Albo & Oblon, LLP, Arlington, VA, counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
James E. Hicks, Office of General Counsel, Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice, Alexandria, VA, counsel for Respondent.
STERN, Board Judge.
Order
Progressive Technologies Management, Inc. (Progressive), filed an appeal from the denial by the Department of Justice’s Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) of Progressive’s claim for $104,191.62, for work it alleged that it performed under its contract with the DEA.
Appellant has advised the Board that the parties have settled all matters raised in this appeal. Appellant, accordingly, requests that the Board dismiss the appeal with prejudice. ________________________________
2 CBCA 533
The request is granted. The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
JAMES L. STERN
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Progressive Technologies Management, Inc., CBCA 533. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.