CBCA 536

Telesis Corporation

May 22, 2007Judge SternDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Not published in the listingDismissed on other grounds

Key Facts

Appellant
Telesis Corporation
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Judge
Stern
Case number
CBCA 536
Decided
May 22, 2007The decision states May 22, 2007 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Reed Smith LLP
Outcome
Dismissed on other grounds
The appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Kurt D. Ferstl and Leigh T. Hansson
Reed Smith LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Ralph G. Bittelari and Richard E. Hurst
Office of Chief Counsel, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,471 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 22, 2007 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

1 authority read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Public laws1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 22, 2007

CBCA 536

TELESIS CORPORATION,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.

Kurt D. Ferstl and Leigh T. Hansson of Reed Smith LLP, Washington, DC, counsel

for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Ralph G. Bittelari and Richard E. Hurst, Office of Chief Counsel, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

STERN, Board Judge.

Order

The Department of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) awarded Telesis Corporation (Telesis) a delivery order for support seminars at AFT’s National Training Center. The order was issued against a General Services Administration contract with Telesis. Telesis filed with the contracting officer various claims arising out of contract performance. These claims were denied and Telesis appealed to the Department of Transportation Board of Contract Appeals (DOTBCA). Telesis sought $647,525.20, plus __________________________

Pursuant to statute all the cases pending before the DOTBCA were transferred to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals on January 6, 2007. Pub. L. No. 109-163, § 847,

2 CBCA 536

interest for various alleged government actions and inactions.

Subsequent to pretrial proceedings, Telesis filed a motion for dismissal of the appeal. ATF does not oppose the motion.

The appellant’s motion is granted. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

JAMES L. STERN

Board Judge

119 Stat. 3136, 3391 (2006).

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Telesis Corporation, CBCA 536. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.