GRANTED IN PART: January 17, 2017
CBCA 5441
INTEGRATED CONCEPTS AND RESEARCH CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Kurt J. Hamrock and Raymond B. Biagini of Covington & Burling LLP,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Bernard J. McShane and Evan Wisser, Office of Chief Counsel, Maritime
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS, O’ROURKE, and CHADWICK.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation timely appealed from the deemed denial of a certified claim for $10,060,746.63. Its complaint increased the amount of the claim to $10,456,608. The parties subsequently filed a joint motion complying with Board Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2015)) for a stipulated award of $10,400,000, “inclusive of all interest” if payment is timely made. The Department of Transportation states that it intends to pay $4,168,298 of this amount from available agency funds and to submit the remainder, $6,231,702, for payment from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).
We grant the motion.
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART. The appellant is awarded $10,400,000, without statutory interest, except that, as stipulated, interest under 41 U.S.C. § 7109(a)(1) shall begin to run on the sum of $6,231,702 on March 24, 2017.
____________________________
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
We concur:
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation, CBCA 5441. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.