CBCA 5449

Richter Developments, Ltd.

Jan 30, 2018Judge SheridanGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Richter Developments, Ltd.
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Sheridan
Case number
CBCA 5449
Decided
Jan 30, 2018The decision states Jan 30, 2018 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Akerman LLP
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

EAJA and feesJurisdiction and timelinessPayment and interestChanges and equitable adjustment

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
John M. Neary and Stephen B. Hurlbut
Akerman LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Jay Bernstein
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision3 pages, 4,859 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jan 30, 2018 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

5 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Equal Access to Justice Act2
Agency FAR supplements1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: January 30, 2018

CBCA 5449

RICHTER DEVELOPMENTS, LTD.,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

John M. Neary and Stephen B. Hurlbut of Akerman LLP, Washington, DC, counsel

for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Jay Bernstein, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges SHERIDAN, KULLBERG, and LESTER.

SHERIDAN, Board Judge.

On March 29, 2016, appellant, Richter Developments, Ltd. (Richter) brought a claim against respondent, General Services Administration (GSA), regarding amounts due under lease GS-04P-LFL62198. Appellant thereafter appealed the final decision of July 28, 2016. The matter was docketed at the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals as CBCA 5449. On January 29, 2018, Richter and GSA submitted a joint stipulation for entry of judgment in favor of Richter. The joint stipulation, which the Board by this order of judgment adopts, provides:

1. In full and final resolution of all elements of Richter’s certified claim for “reimbursement of delay costs and GSA-directed changes” that is detailed in Exhibit A of Richter’s Schedule of Costs, dated June 21, 2017 (the “SOC”), the parties agree that GSA will pay Richter the lump sum amount of $85,680, plus CDA [Contract Disputes Act] interest at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury, commencing on March 29, 2016.

2. In full and final resolution of all elements of Richter’s certified claim for “equitable adjustment in operating expense rent” that is detailed in Exhibit B of the SOC, the parties agree that: (a) GSA will pay Richter the lump sum amount of $27,000; (b) commencing on November 1, 2017, the total annual operating expense rent paid by GSA to Richter will be $60,000; and (c) commencing on December 1, 2018, the total annual operating expense rent paid by GSA to Richter will be $66,707. GSA currently compensates Richter in the amount of $7,000 per year for janitorial salaries. However, commencing on November 1, 2017, GSA will compensate Richter $13,000 per year for janitorial salaries, which is included in the revised operating expense rent detailed above. The parties further agree that relative solely to the $6,000 increased portion of the janitorial salaries (from $7,000 to $13,000) going forward, if there is a minimum wage increase which affects said janitorial salaries, GSA will compensate Richter for such amounts.

3. In full and final resolution of all elements of Richter’s certified claim for “equitable adjustment in shell rent” that is detailed in Exhibit C of the SOC, the parties agree that: (a) GSA will pay Richter the lump sum amount of $9,300, plus CDA interest at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury, commencing on March 29, 2016; and (b) commencing on November 1, 2017, the annual shell rent paid by GSA to Richter will increase by the amount of $5,595.

4. In full and final resolution of all elements of Richter’s certified claim for “reimbursement of excess tenant improvement costs” that is detailed in Exhibit D of the SOC, the parties agree that GSA will pay Richter the lump sum amount of $449,726, plus CDA interest at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury, commencing on March 29, 2016.

The parties stipulate that, upon entry of the requested final judgment, all disputes, claims, counterclaims and issues related to CBCA No. 5449 will be fully and finally resolved, with the exception of Richter’s claim for attorneys’ fees and expenses, which is expressly reserved. GSA agrees that, upon entry of the requested final judgment, Richter shall be a prevailing party on all claims brought in this appeal for the purposes of Richter’s claim for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U. S. C. § 504. Pursuant to CBCA Rule 31 [48 CFR 6101.31 (2017)], Richter and GSA certify that they shall not seek review or reconsideration of judgment so rendered, provided that upon entry of the consent judgment Richter may file an application for attorney fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. With respect to the decision of the Board issued pursuant to this motion, Richter and GSA waive their rights to reconsideration under CBCA Rule 26, rights to relief from judgment under CBCA Rule 27, and rights to appeal the decision.

Decision

Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART. By adopting the parties’ joint stipulated settlement, Richter is to be paid pursuant to the terms of the stipulated settlement, with interest to accrue on the amounts due pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2012) starting on March 29, 2016, and continuing until the date of payment. Payment does not include attorney fees and expenses, which are expressly reserved under the stipulated settlement. PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN

Board Judge

We concur:

H. CHUCK KULLBERG

Board Judge

HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Richter Developments, Ltd., CBCA 5449. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.