CBCA 5748

CTA I, LLC

May 18, 2017Judge ChadwickDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
DecisionDenied

Key Facts

Appellant
CTA I, LLC
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Chadwick
Case number
CBCA 5748
Decided
May 18, 2017The decision states May 18, 2017 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC
Outcome
Denied
The petition is DENIED.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
John M. Manfredonia and James Peterson
Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC
Cresskill, NJ
For the respondent
Harold W. Askins III
Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Charleston, SC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,027 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 18, 2017 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Contract Disputes Act1
Agency FAR supplements1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DENIED: May 18, 2017

CBCA 5748

CTA I, LLC,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

John M. Manfredonia and James Peterson of Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC,

Cresskill, NJ, counsel for Petitioner.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Harold W. Askins III, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, SC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges GOODMAN, KULLBERG, and CHADWICK.

CHADWICK, Board Judge.

On May 15, 2017, CTA I, LLC (CTA) filed a petition under 41 U.S.C. § 7103(f)(4) (2012) and Board Rule 2(a)(2) (48 CFR 6101.2(a)(2) (2015)) for an order directing a contracting officer of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to issue a decision on a pending claim “no later than June 1, 2017.” We have jurisdiction over the petition because CTA’s pending claim, which it attached to the petition, exceeds $100,000, was certified, and was submitted more than sixty days ago. See Hawk Contracting Group, LLC v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 5527, 16-1 BCA ¶ 36,572, at 178,118. We deny the petition.

CTA filed the petition seventeen calendar days, and twelve business days (given the Memorial Day holiday), before the date by which it seeks the contracting officer’s decision. The Board has no rules of procedure for such petitions, but Rule 8, governing motions, which we find closely analogous, generally allows an opposing party to respond “within 20 calendar days.” Rule 8(f). We could not, at this point, give VA a similarly reasonable amount of time to respond to the petition; receive CTA’s reply, if any; and then issue a panel decision in time for the contracting officer to act on it by June 1, if we granted the petition. CTA, which does not even request expedited review, identifies no emergency that demands action in seventeen (now fourteen) days. Its petition is thus unsupported on its face.

Decision

The petition is DENIED.

KYLE CHADWICK

Board Judge

We concur:

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

H. CHUCK KULLBERG

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in CTA I, LLC, CBCA 5748. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.