DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 3, 2009
CBCA 582, 1195
CHARLES ENGINEERING CO.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
J. Michael Littlejohn and Pavan I. Khoobchandani of Akerman Senterfitt Wickwire Gavin, Vienna, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Tracy Downing, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Augusta, GA; and Charlma J. Quarles and Phillipa L. Anderson, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
Order
On February 26, 2009, the parties forwarded to the Board a joint motion requesting that the Board dismiss the above-captioned appeals with prejudice pursuant to the terms of their settlement agreement dated January 13, 2009. The parties requested that the Board’s order state the following: “As part of the settlement agreement between the parties, the [Department of Veterans Affairs] has agreed to change the past performance evaluation to reflect a SATISFACTORY rating.”
______________________________
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Charles Engineering Co., CBCA 582, 1195. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.