CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43

Innovative (PBX) Telephone Service

Mar 1, 2007Judge SheridanDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Innovative (PBX) Telephone Service
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Sheridan
Case number
CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43This cell names 9 dockets: 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43.
Decided
Mar 1, 2007The decision states Mar 1, 2007 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, and in accordance with the settlement agreement entered into between the parties, the appeals of Innovative (PBX) Telephone Service, CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43, are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
David W. Young
Innovative (PBX) Telephone Service
El Paso, TX
For the respondent
Brian Reed and Dennis Foley
Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision3 pages, 1,328 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Mar 1, 2007 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: March 1, 2007

INNOVATIVE (PBX) TELEPHONE SERVICE,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

David W. Young, Vice President of Innovative (PBX) Telephone Service, El Paso, TX, appearing for Appellant.

Brian Reed and Dennis Foley, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

SHERIDAN, Board Judge.

Order

On February 6, 2007, the parties advised the Board that they have settled the matters set forth below and jointly moved the Board to dismiss the appeals with prejudice. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, and in accordance with the settlement agreement entered into between the parties, the appeals of Innovative (PBX) Telephone Service, CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43, are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This dismissal shall convert to one with prejudice ninety days from the date of this order or upon effectuation of the settlement agreement, whichever occurs first.

__________________________ CBCA 44, 45, 46, and 576 remain on the Board’s docket with all memoranda and orders relating to those appeals in effect.

2CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43

PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN

Board Judge #18098 CBCA 6, 36-43 INNOVATIVETELPHONESERVICE.doc 3/1/07 Reviewed by:PJS CLH

3CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Innovative (PBX) Telephone Service, CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.