DENIED: May 13, 2021
CBCA 6175, 6176
INNOTION ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Doug P. Hibshman and Nicholas T. Solosky of Fox Rothschild LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Jonathan English and Julie Cannatti, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS (Chair), BEARDSLEY, and SHERIDAN.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
Innotion Enterprises, Inc. (Innotion) seeks damages arising out of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) decisions denying Innotion’s claims for payment for certain custodial property inspections performed by appellant under HUD Field Service Management 3.10 contracts. The Board stayed these appeals pending resolution of Purdy Enterprise, LLC v. Department of Housing & Urban Development, CBCA 6128, et al.
(Mar. 15, 2021), and the appeal of P.K. Management Group, Inc. v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development, CBCA 6185, 19-1 BCA ¶ 37,417, aff’d, P.K. Management Group, Inc. v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development, 987 F.3d. 1030 (Fed. Cir. 2021), to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Once we decided the issue in HUD’s favor in Purdy, we issued a show cause order directing appellant to explain why these appeals should not also be denied. Appellant has failed to do so. Accordingly, these appeals are denied.
Decision
We DENY these appeals.
Patricia J. Sheridan
Board Judge
We concur:
Jeri Kaylene Somers
Board Judge
Erica S. Beardsley
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Innotion Enterprises, Inc., CBCA 6175, 6176. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.