CBCA 6224, 6027

WageWorks, Inc.

Apr 9, 2019Judge HyattOFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
DismissalWithdrawn

Key Facts

Appellant
WageWorks, Inc.
Respondent agency
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Judge
Hyatt
Case number
CBCA 6224, 6027This cell names 2 dockets: 6224, 6027.
Decided
Apr 9, 2019The decision states Apr 9, 2019 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
Odin Feldman Pittleman PC, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC
Outcome
Withdrawn
Count II of CBCA 6027 is also DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Lars E. Anderson and Sally Ann Hostetler and Shiva S. Hamidinia and James P. Miller
Odin Feldman Pittleman PC
Reston, VA
For the appellant
Dale Bish
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC
Palo Alto, CA
For the respondent
Matthew Donohue and Austin Fulk and Sean Belanger
Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,081 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 9, 2019 on its own faceRespondent OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

CBCA 6027 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE IN PART;

CBCA 6224 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 9, 2019

CBCA 6027, 6224

WAGEWORKS, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Lars E. Anderson, Sally Ann Hostetler, Shiva S. Hamidinia, and James P. Miller of Odin Feldman Pittleman PC, Reston, VA; and Dale Bish of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, counsel for Appellant.

Matthew Donohue, Austin Fulk, and Sean Belanger, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

HYATT, Board Judge.

Order

Appellant, WageWorks, Inc., has filed a motion requesting voluntary dismissal, with prejudice, of its appeal docketed as CBCA 6224 and count II of the complaint in its appeal docketed as CBCA 6027, leaving count I of its appeal in CBCA 6027 as the only claim remaining for decision in these consolidated appeals.

Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), the motion is granted. CBCA 6224 is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Count II of CBCA 6027 is also DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Catherine B. Hyatt

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in WageWorks, Inc., CBCA 6224, 6027. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.