CBCA 6311

Bancroft Architects + Engineers

Sep 18, 2019Judge SheridanDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Bancroft Architects + Engineers
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Sheridan
Case number
CBCA 6311
Decided
Sep 18, 2019The decision states Sep 18, 2019 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Koprince Law
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
The Board GRANTS IN PART this appeal.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Matthew T. Schoonover and Shane J. McCall and Haley E. Claxton
Koprince Law
Lawrence, KS
For the respondent
David E. Fagan
Veterans Affairs
Portland, OR
For the respondent
Donald Mobly
Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Denver, CO
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,426 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 18, 2019 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

1 authority read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Other statutes1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: September 18, 2019

CBCA 6311

BANCROFT ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Matthew T. Schoonover, Shane J. McCall, and Haley E. Claxton of Koprince Law, LLC, Lawrence, KS, counsel for Appellant.

David E. Fagan, Office ofGeneral Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Portland, OR; and Donald Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges SHERIDAN, SULLIVAN, and O’ROURKE.

SHERIDAN, Board Judge.

On September 17, 2019, the parties submitted to the Board a joint motion for a stipulated judgment. The parties request that the Board enter judgment in the amount of $271,000, with payment to be made through the permanent indefinite judgment fund in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012). The amount includes any costs and expenses, interest, and attorney fees to which appellant, Bancroft Architects + Engineers, may be entitled. The parties have agreed that they will not seek appeal of, reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision.

Decision

The Board GRANTS IN PART this appeal. In accordance with the parties’ joint motion, the Board awards Bancroft Architects + Engineers the stipulated judgment amount of $271,000.

Patricia J. Sheridan

Board Judge

We concur:

Marian E. Sullivan

Board Judge

Kathleen J. O’Rourke

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Bancroft Architects + Engineers, CBCA 6311. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.