CBCA 66

USProtect Corporation

Nov 20, 2007Judge FennessyDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
USProtect Corporation
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Judge
Fennessy
Case number
CBCA 66
Decided
Nov 20, 2007The decision states Nov 20, 2007 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Outcome
Settled
Therefore, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Shlomo D. Katz and Daniel B. Abrahams
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Jennifer L. Longmeyer-Wood
Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 875 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Nov 20, 2007 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 20, 2007

CBCA 66

USPROTECT CORPORATION,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondent.

Shlomo D. Katz and Daniel B. Abrahams of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.,

Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Jennifer L. Longmeyer-Wood, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

FENNESSY, Board Judge.

Order

The parties have filed a joint stipulation for dismissal of this appeal with prejudice upon the ground that appellant has decided not to prosecute this appeal. The parties state that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the dismissal of this appeal and they will not appeal the dismissal of this appeal.

Therefore, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

EILEEN P. FENNESSY

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in USProtect Corporation, CBCA 66. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.