CBCA 661

MVM, Inc.

Jun 18, 2007Judge VergilioDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
MVM, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Judge
Vergilio
Case number
CBCA 661
Decided
Jun 18, 2007The decision states Jun 18, 2007 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Cohen Mohr LLP
Outcome
Settled
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timelinessPayment and interest

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Tenley A. Carp
Cohen Mohr LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Armando Rodriguez-Feo
Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,471 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jun 18, 2007 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 18, 2007

CBCA 661

MVM, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.

Tenley A. Carp of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Armando Rodriguez-Feo, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

VERGILIO, Board Judge.

Order

On February 28, 2007, this Board received a notice of appeal from MVM, Inc.

(contractor) concerning its contract, MS-02-D-0002, with the United States Marshals Service. In a certified claim dated December 14, 2006, the contractor had requested payment of $710,295.28. The contractor contends that this amount is based upon properly invoiced amounts (plus Prompt Payment Act interest) for work it performed pursuant to the contract in 2005 and 2006 and which was accepted by the Government. Having not received a decision by the contracting officer, the contractor filed this appeal based upon a deemed denial of its claim.

The parties engaged in discussions regarding the particulars of the invoices and payment. By a submission received on June 15, 2007, the contractor provided the Board with a statement that the parties have resolved the underlying dispute. The stated withdrawal of _________________________

2 CBCA 661

the appeal is understood to mean a joint request for a dismissal with prejudice, as conveyed during a telephone conference on May 31.

The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in MVM, Inc., CBCA 661. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.