CBCA 6688

Analytic Services Inc.

Jan 14, 2020Judge SheridanDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
DecisionDismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Key Facts

Appellant
Analytic Services Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Judge
Sheridan
Case number
CBCA 6688
Decided
Jan 14, 2020The decision states Jan 14, 2020 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Based on these facts, these appeals are DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timelinessChanges and equitable adjustment

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Daniel V. Wright
Analytic Services Inc.
Falls Church, VA
For the respondent
Tami S. Hagberg
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,306 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jan 14, 2020 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

3 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. 2 open at a publisher or in this app; the rest are shown without a link because no published page for them was confirmed.

Other regulations1
41 C.F.R. § 6101.12

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: January 14, 2020

CBCA 6688

ANALYTIC SERVICES INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Daniel V. Wright, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary of Analytic Services Inc., Falls Church, VA, counsel for Appellant.

Tami S. Hagberg, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges GOODMAN, KULLBERG, and SHERIDAN.

SHERIDAN, Board Judge.

On January 10, 2020, appellant, Analytic Services Inc. (ANSER), and respondent, Department of Health and Human Services, jointly moved to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(3) (41 CFR 6101.12(b)(3) (2019)).

ANSER represents that it did not intend its request for an equitable adjustment (REA) to be a claim under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012) (CDA). ANSER also maintains that its REA did not track with the claim certification language required by the CDA and did not request a contracting officer’s final decision.

Decision

Based on these facts, these appeals are DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

Jurisdiction.

Patricia J. Sheridan

Board Judge

We concur:

ALLAN H. GOODMAN H. CHUCK KULLBERG ALLAN H. GOODMAN H. CHUCK KULLBERG Board Judge Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Analytic Services Inc., CBCA 6688. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.