DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 20, 2007
US PROTECT CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Shlomo D. Katz and Daniel B. Abrahams of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Jennifer L. Longmeyer-Wood, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
FENNESSY, Board Judge.
Order
The parties have notified the Board, pursuant to Rule 25(b), that these appeals have been settled by the payment of $152,000, by respondent to appellant, and they stipulate to the dismissal of these appeals. The parties state that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the dismissal of these appeals and they will not appeal the dismissal of these appeals.
Therefore, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
EILEEN P. FENNESSY
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in USProtect Corporation, CBCA 67, 671. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.