GRANTED IN PART: August 11, 2020
CBCA 6840, 6852, 6853, 6854, 6855
NAGEL ARCHITECTS, A SERIES OF NAGEL SERVICES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Sarah Schauerte Reida of Legal Meets Practical, LLC, Naperville, IL, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Portland, OR; and Natica Chapman Neely, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Jackson, MS, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges BEARDSLEY, GOODMAN, and KULLBERG.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
On August 10, 2020, the parties submitted to the Board a joint motion for judgment on a stipulated settlement in these five appeals. The parties requested that the Board enter judgment in favor of Nagel Architects, A Series of Nagel Services, LLC, in the amount of $34,000, with payment to be made through the permanent indefinite judgment fund in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2018). The amount includes any costs, interest, and attorney fees to which Nagel Architects, A Series of Nagel Services, LLC, may be entitled. The parties have agreed that they will not seek appeal of, reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision.
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART these appeals. In accordance with the parties’ joint motion, the Board awards Nagel Architects, A Series of Nagel Services, LLC, the stipulated judgment amount of $34,000.
Erica S. Beardsley
Board Judge
We concur:
Allan H. Goodman
Board Judge
H. Chuck Kullberg
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Nagel Architects, A Series of Nagel Services, LLC, CBCA 6840, 6852, 6853, 6854, 6855. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.