DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 4, 2009
CBCA 899
LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Lori Conlon of Lockheed Martin Information Systems & Global Services, Cherry Hill, NJ, counsel for Appellant.
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
Order
On September 14, 2007, Lockheed Martin Integrated Technology (contractor) filed a notice of appeal pursuant to the amended Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601 613 (2006). Underlying this dispute is a task order issued under the contractor’s contract, GS00T99SJA0697, with the General Services Administation (Government). The contractor seeks $2,155,054.92, which the contracting officer denied, having concluded that there was no authorization to exceed the ceiling on the task order, to continue work beyond the period of performance, or to increase the scope of work from that identified in the task order. On September 3, 2009, following protracted attempts to effectuate a settlement, the Board received from the parties a joint request for a dismissal with prejudice. The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Lockheed Martin Integrated Technology, LLC, CBCA 899. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.