CBCA 8320

Hensel Phelps Construction Co.

Aug 17, 2026Judge ZischkauGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Hensel Phelps Construction Co.
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Zischkau
Case number
CBCA 8320
Decided
Aug 17, 2026The decision states Aug 17, 2026 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino, LLP
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interest

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Todd R. Metz and Brian R. Dugdale
Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino, LLP
Tysons Corner, VA
For the respondent
Alexander C. Vincent
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,161 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Aug 17, 2026 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

5 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. 4 open at a publisher or in this app; the rest are shown without a link because no published page for them was confirmed.

Other statutes1
Agency FAR supplements1
Other regulations1
31 C.F.R. part 256

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: August 17, 2026

CBCA 8320

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO.,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

Todd R. Metz and Brian R. Dugdale of Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino, LLP, Tysons

Corner, VA, counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Alexander C. Vincent, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges ZISCHKAU, VOLK, and NEWSOM.

ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.

On August 6, 2026, appellant, Hensel Phelps Construction Co., and respondent, General Services Administration (GSA), filed a joint motion requesting the entry of a stipulated judgment in the amount of $2,416,808.94 to be paid to Hensel Phelps as follows: (1) $350,000 from available, appropriated funds of GSA; and (2) $2,066,808.94 from the permanent, indefinite judgment fund, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2024), Board Rule 31 (48 CFR 6101.31 (published in eCFR)), and 31 CFR part 256 (2025). The parties further stipulate that: (1) the judgment amount is inclusive of interest under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109, through the date of this stipulated award decision; (2) upon entry of the final stipulated award, all disputes, claims, counterclaims, and issues that were or could have been litigated in CBCA 8320 are fully and finally settled and resolved; (3) Hensel Phelps waives any right that it may have to recover attorney fees, costs, and expenses that it may have incurred in conjunction with this appeal; and (4) the parties will not seek reconsideration of, seek relief from, or appeal the Board’s entry of judgment awarding the stipulated amount to Hensel Phelps.

Decision

The appeal is GRANTED IN PART. GSA shall pay $2,416,808.94 (inclusive of any CDA interest accrued to date) to Hensel Phelps in full settlement of CBCA 8320, according to the stipulations above, with additional CDA interest running from the date of this judgment until the payment date. The Board commends the parties on the successful resolution of this matter.

Jonathan D. Zischkau

Board Judge

We concur:

Daniel B. Volk

Board Judge

Elizabeth W. Newsom

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Hensel Phelps Construction Co., CBCA 8320. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.