CBCA 95

Mountain Valley Lumber Company, Inc.

Jul 10, 2008Judge PollackDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Not published in the listingGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Mountain Valley Lumber Company, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
Pollack
Case number
CBCA 95
Decided
Jul 10, 2008The decision states Jul 10, 2008 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Saltman & Stevens, P.C.
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Richard W. Goeken
Saltman & Stevens, P.C.
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Kenneth S. Capps
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
Denver, CO
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision3 pages, 2,678 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jul 10, 2008 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

3 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Other statutes1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: July 10, 2008

CBCA 95

MOUNTAIN VALLEY LUMBER COMPANY, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

Richard W. Goeken of Saltman & Stevens, P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for

Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Kenneth S. Capps, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), VERGILIO, and POLLACK.

POLLACK, Board Judge.

This appeal arises out of timber sale contract no. 007744, between Mountain Valley Lumber Company, Inc. (Mountain Valley) and the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (FS). Mountain Valley filed this appeal in the amount of $1,663,934.06 on May 14, 2003, and it was docketed as AGBCA 2003-171-1 at the Department of Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals. The appeal was transferred to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals and docketed as CBCA 95.

________________________________

_____________________________ _____________________________ 2

Over the life of the appeal, the parties have filed numerous procedural motions, as well as motions for summary relief. After extensive and disputed discovery, the parties advised the Board in 2007 that they were proceeding with preliminary discussions as to possible settlement. This was assisted in part by a decision by the Court of Federal Claims on another matter, which apparently clarified some potential damage issues. Extensions in discovery were granted by the Board to allow for settlement discussions.

On July 1, 2008, the Board received a stipulation and request for decision granting the appeal. The joint stipulation was dated June 26, 2008. Under it, the parties agreed that they had settled any and all claims by either party arising out of or relating to the underlying contract and the instant appeal. Further, the parties agreed to abide by a Board decision requiring the FS to pay appellant $410,000, plus interest on this amount calculated from November 8, 2002, until paid in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Disputes Act. Each party has agreed to bear its own costs and attorney fees. The parties additionally stipulated that the decision of the Board will be final and binding upon the parties and not subject to further appeal.

Decision

Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ joint stipulation, the Board awards the sum of $410,000, plus interest on said amount under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 611(2000), beginning November 8, 2002. Payment is to be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.

HOWARD A. POLLACK

Board Judge

We concur:

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Mountain Valley Lumber Company, Inc., CBCA 95. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.