CBCA 962

Jim Ferguson

Apr 7, 2008Judge VergilioGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Jim Ferguson
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Vergilio
Case number
CBCA 962
Decided
Apr 7, 2008The decision states Apr 7, 2008 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
On April 3, 2008, the Board received a joint stipulation of dismissal, in which the parties request a dismissal with prejudice, having settled the dispute. ______________________________ 2 Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
James R. Rodgers and The Moore Law Firm and L.L.P.
Paris, TX
For the respondent
Gabriel N. Steinberg
Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration
Atlanta, GA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,360 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 7, 2008 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 7, 2008

CBCA 962

JIM FERGUSON,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

James R. Rodgers, The Moore Law Firm, L.L.P., Paris, TX, counsel for Appellant.

Gabriel N. Steinberg, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.

VERGILIO, Board Judge.

Order

On November 5, 2007, the Board received from Mr. Ferguson a notice of appeal concerning a contracting officer’s decision dated August 2, 2007. In the decision, the contracting officer confirmed earlier correspondence that deemed Mr. Ferguson to be in default and liable for liquidated damages because of failure to pay for and remove a vehicle purchased during an on-line auction held by the respondent, the General Services Administration (Government). Mr. Ferguson maintains that he did not bid on the vehicle. He seeks to have the default voided and his record cleared.

After an initial conference with the Board, and the submission of an appeal file, the parties exchanged information and engaged in discussions. On April 3, 2008, the Board received a joint stipulation of dismissal, in which the parties request a dismissal with prejudice, having settled the dispute.

______________________________

2 CBCA 962

Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Jim Ferguson, CBCA 962. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.