GRANTED IN PART: November 24, 2008
CBCA 965
CM CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
David D. Gilliss and Owen J. Curley of Niles, Barton & Wilmer, LLP, Baltimore,
MD, counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Mel Myers, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges STERN, HYATT, and WALTERS.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
On November 17, 2008, the parties, appellant, CM Construction, Inc. (CM), and respondent, the General Services Administration (GSA), filed a joint motion for judgment on stipulated settlement, stating that they had reached an amicable settlement of the issues in this appeal, asking for judgment from the Board in CM’s favor in the amount of $125,000, to be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2000), and stating further that, under their stipulation of settlement, they had agreed that neither party will seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision under Rules 26 and 27, respectively, and that neither party will appeal the Board’s decision.
_______________________________
________________________________ _______________________________
2 CBCA 965
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ stipulation of settlement, the Board awards appellant the sum of $125,000, to be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2000).
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
We concur:
JAMES L. STERN
Board Judge
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in CM Construction, Inc., CBCA 965. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.