Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. sought reconsideration of the Board's decision concerning the timeliness of the government's Contract Disputes Act statute-of-limitations claim. The Board denied KBR's motion seeking a ruling that reconsideration was timely and dismissed the reconsideration motion as untimely.
Material Facts
- The Board issued the underlying decision on 13 May 2015.
- The Board sent a copy of the decision to KBR's counsel of record by certified mail on 14 May 2015.
- An employee of the delivery service retained by KBR's then counsel signed the certified receipt on 23 May 2015.
- KBR's current counsel filed a notice of appearance on 17 June 2015, stating that current counsel were replacing prior counsel.
- KBR filed its motion for reconsideration by email on 26 June 2015.
- KBR's former counsel received an electronic copy of the decision from the Board on 27 May 2015.
- KBR's former counsel apparently received a hard copy of the decision from its delivery service on 2 June 2015.
- Houston experienced torrential rainfall and mass flooding from the evening of 25 May through 26 May 2015, and the former counsel's offices were closed on 26 May 2015.
Parties
- Appellant
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Contract Management Agency
- Contract Number
- DAAA09-02-D-0007
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Pratt & Whitney, a division of Raytheon Technologies CompanyNo. 59222November 22, 2021
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58212, 58753June 14, 2021
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58841June 14, 2021
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58842June 14, 2021
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59439, 59440, 59441June 14, 2021
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 60699June 14, 2021
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026
- Watts Constructors, LLCNo. 63753September 25, 2025
- Sayar Development Inc.No. 63871, 63894, 64191, 64227August 6, 2025
- US Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 63957August 6, 2025
- CACI International Inc.No. 63663May 6, 2025