64444

Dubai Pearl Company

August 26, 2026Judge O'Connell
Denied / Government PrevailedCDA JurisdictionStatute of Limitations / Timeliness

The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals granted the Defense Logistics Agency summary judgment in Dubai Pearl Company's appeal concerning a scrap-sale contract. The Board held that the claim accrued no later than December 31, 2014, was submitted after the six-year limitations period, and was not saved by an earlier communication or equitable tolling.

Material Facts

  • DLA awarded Dubai Pearl Company a contract for the sale of metallic and non-metallic scrap in Iraq with a performance period ending December 31, 2014.
  • The contract required Dubai Pearl Company to pay the government on a per-kilogram basis and required a deposit.
  • DLA never made any scrap available to Dubai Pearl Company.
  • The Government of Iraq exercised a right of first refusal and sought to take the scrap.
  • Dubai Pearl Company continued asking DLA about the contract status through and after the performance period.
  • DLA arranged a refund of the deposit in 2018.
  • Dubai Pearl Company's certified claim alleged that the United States had allowed the Iraqi government to seize the scrap and had constructively failed to safeguard contractor performance and property.
  • The contracting officer's final decision stated that the claim was untimely and alternatively that liability would have been limited to the deposit.
  • The May 3, 2020 letter expressed an interest in compensation but did not state a sum certain or approximate amount, request a final decision, or certify the letter as a claim.

Parties

Appellant
Dubai Pearl Company
Respondent Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Contracting Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Contract Number
39-2601-0028
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.